You may use any or all of these search functions to trawl the entire Axis of Eco archived articles.


Search by keyword:
Search by date:
  • From
  • Until
Search by category:

Tag search results (1 - 10 of 15) - Page 1

You searched for articles with the tag 'Human Health'

What we're doing Wrong

‘Safe for use’ – but not in Canada

13th December 2010

“We felt the best thing was to give these victims the chance to appeal to the Quebec government as human beings, face to face.”

What we're doing Wrong

A lethal injection

14th September 2010

Canadian government support for white asbestos provides legitimacy to a deadly product.

Why it matters

“I’ll die doing this”

22nd April 2010

Indigenous people in Alberta, Canada, are becoming ill as a result of tar sands pollution. They share their stories of cancer, cover-ups and courage.

What we're doing Right

Searching for a substitute

15th March 2010

Polycarbonate plastics made with bisphenol-a (BPA) have a myriad number of uses for good reason. Hard, clear, heat and shatter-resistant, they are invaluable – but also controversial. So chemists are cleverly crafting alternatives.

Why it matters

Food packaging chemical linked to heart disease, cancer

18th January 2010

American regulatory agency joins Canada with concerns over safety of bisphenol-A

What we're doing Right

Over the moon (cup)?

14th January 2010

Don’t like the cup? There are other means for menses.

What we're doing Wrong

Death by a thousand cuts

8th December 2009

The tar sands make billions in profits, but little trickles down to monitor the water it affects

Why it matters

A fishy business

5th June 2009

Flame retardants found at “very high levels” in the brains of beached whales

What we're doing Wrong

Enough to make your eyes water

20th May 2009

There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that we need to drink eight glasses of water a day – despite advertising campaigns, and the bottled water companies that fund them

What we're doing Wrong

Fire proof?

8th May 2009

Canada moves to ban a chemical used in electronics and textiles that is potentially toxic – but the chemicals brought as replacements are not tested for toxicity first, and are already being found in wildlife.